Best Product Design Companies

Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) edges ahead of Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch.. Gapsy Studio is the stronger option for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary

Criterion Phenomenon Studio Gapsy Studio
Founded 2019 2014
HQ Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) Dnipro, Ukraine
Team size 70+ Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)
Rating 4.8 / 5 4.5 / 5
Best for Companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch. Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.
Pricing model Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Webflow, React Figma, Webflow, After Effects
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail

Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: overview

Phenomenon Studio

Founded in 2019, Phenomenon Studio is a boutique product design and development company built for a specific situation: a business that has evolved past the brand, website, or product it launched with. Instead of splitting strategy, design, development, and post-launch support across separate vendors, Phenomenon runs all four phases through one senior team. That team — 70+ specialists based in Europe, with legal entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland — works across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech, and has shipped 120+ products for clients that have collectively raised over $500M.

Gapsy Studio

Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.

Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Capability Phenomenon Studio Gapsy Studio
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Framework / platform Phenomenon Studio Gapsy Studio
Figma
Webflow
React
Framer N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects

Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Criterion Phenomenon Studio Gapsy Studio
Minimum engagement Not published $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Dimension Phenomenon Studio Gapsy Studio
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare
Best use cases Redesigning a SaaS platform ahead of a funding round, Rebuilding a fintech or healthcare product to modern, compliant UX standards Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons

Phenomenon Studio
+ 5.0 Clutch rating with Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognitions
+ Compliancy Group-verified HIPAA compliance, unusual among boutique product design companies
+ Nielsen Norman Group UX Certification and a four-tier Webflow Experts partnership
+ Single team ownership from strategy through post-launch removes the hand-off risk of splitting vendors
+ Roughly half of clients return for a second project
+ 120+ launched products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising
- The discovery-first process takes more time upfront, which can feel slow to clients wanting to start building immediately
- Does not offer product or growth marketing — a separate agency is needed for post-launch growth work
- No public rate card; a discovery call is required for any project-specific quote
Gapsy Studio
+ 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this pool
+ 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush
+ 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record
+ Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team
- Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity
- Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed
- Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA

Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?

Phenomenon Studio is the right choice for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch..

A 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance, and NN/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500M+ in client fundraising. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.

Who should choose Gapsy Studio?

Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..

A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.

Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Phenomenon Studio
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Phenomenon Studio
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Gapsy Studio
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Use case Phenomenon Studio fit Gapsy Studio fit Winner
Redesigning a SaaS platform ahead of a funding round Strong Limited Phenomenon Studio
Rebuilding a fintech or healthcare product to modern, compliant UX standards Strong Limited Phenomenon Studio
Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work Strong Strong Both equally
Healthcare or EdTech product redesign Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance, and NN/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500M+ in client fundraising. It is best for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch..

Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the better choice when fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. If your situation matches those criteria, Gapsy Studio is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio FAQ

Is Phenomenon Studio better than Gapsy Studio?

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio is better for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..

How do Phenomenon Studio and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?

Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Gapsy Studio?

Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Gapsy Studio?

Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0 clutch rating, hipaa compliance, and nn/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500m+ in client fundraising. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (70+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.