UXDA vs Onething Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.2/5) edges ahead of Onething Design (3.8/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a company exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Onething Design is the stronger option for companies needing one company that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
UXDA vs Onething Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | UXDA | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| HQ | Riga, Latvia | Gurugram, India (also Bangalore and San Francisco) |
| Team size | 25+ | 52–73 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Banks and fintech companies wanting a company exclusively focused on financial-services UX. | Companies needing one company that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, retainer | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Sketch, Adobe Creative Suite |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Automotive & mobility |
UXDA vs Onething Design: overview
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, based in Riga, Latvia with a 25+ multidisciplinary team. Over a decade, the company has defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries — an exclusively financial-services focus that makes it the clearest fintech specialist in this pool.
Onething Design
Onething Design took its current name in 2015, renamed from a 2014 predecessor ('Ketchup Designs Studio'), so the founding year is treated as approximate. Headquartered in Gurugram, India with additional locations in Bangalore and San Francisco, the company reports 52–73 employees depending on source. What sets it apart is industry breadth: BFSI, consumer products, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive, all served from one team rather than a single-vertical specialty.
Services and capabilities: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Capability | UXDA | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Framework / platform | UXDA | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Criterion | UXDA | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Dimension | UXDA | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation |
| Best use cases | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market | BFSI product design for a bank or insurer, Automotive digital interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
UXDA vs Onething Design: pros and cons
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist companies simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
| Onething Design | |
|---|---|
| + | Covers five distinct industries from a single team, useful for clients working across multiple verticals |
| + | US (San Francisco) and India (Gurugram, Bangalore) footprint supports round-the-clock delivery |
| + | $10K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is accessible relative to most peers in this pool |
| + | A decade of operation under its current name, with roots stretching back further |
| - | Founding year is approximate — the company was renamed from an earlier predecessor in 2015 |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning gives up some vertical-specific depth compared with specialists like UXDA |
| - | Reported employee count varies by source (52–73), making capacity planning less precise |
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a company exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Onething Design?
Onething Design is the right choice for companies needing one company that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical..
Unusually broad five-industry coverage from one team, with delivery presence spanning the US and India. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Automotive & mobility.
Decision matrix: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | UXDA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Onething Design |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Onething Design |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Onething Design |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: UXDA vs Onething Design
| Use case | UXDA fit | Onething Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank digital platform redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Limited | UXDA |
| BFSI product design for a bank or insurer | Limited | Strong | Onething Design |
| Automotive digital interface design | Limited | Strong | Onething Design |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: UXDA vs Onething Design
UXDA (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. It is best for banks and fintech companies wanting a company exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
Onething Design (3.8/5) is the better choice when companies needing one company that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical.. If your situation matches those criteria, Onething Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
UXDA vs Onething Design FAQ
Is UXDA better than Onething Design?
UXDA (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies wanting a company exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Onething Design is better for companies needing one company that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical..
How do UXDA and Onething Design differ in pricing?
UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Onething Design uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: UXDA or Onething Design?
Onething Design is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between UXDA and Onething Design?
UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Onething Design's primary differentiator is: unusually broad five-industry coverage from one team, with delivery presence spanning the us and india. They also differ in team size (25+ vs 52–73), minimum engagement ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.